Tactics Explained
Season review
Premier League · 2025/26

Manchester City 2025/26

City made more chances than anyone in the league and won both domestic cups in Guardiola's last season. The title slipped away in the minutes after goals: 20 points were dropped from winning positions.

Trophies: League Cup · FA Cup · League: 2nd · Champions League: last 16 (Real Madrid)

2nd · 78 ptsLeague finish · 23-9-6
74.0Expected points · ranked 2nd
+0.83Chance difference per game · ranked 2nd
+4.0Points vs chances

01Did they deserve it?

Points vs expected points, match by match

Solid line: real points. Dashed: points the chances were worth.

0204060800102030 7874

Every team: chances vs luck

Right = better chance difference per game. Up = more points than the chances were worth.

bigger chance gap →↑ more points than chancesArsenal: +1.09 / +5.2Man United: +0.54 / +6.6Aston Villa: +0.03 / +13.9Liverpool: +0.39 / −1.5Bournemouth: +0.27 / −3.4Sunderland: −0.49 / +12.0Brighton: +0.14 / −2.4Brentford: +0.15 / −4.2Chelsea: +0.25 / −6.9Fulham: −0.32 / +6.9Newcastle: +0.07 / −5.8Everton: −0.23 / +2.8Leeds: +0.05 / −9.5Crystal Palace: +0.04 / −8.9Nottm Forest: −0.36 / +1.7Spurs: −0.17 / −8.2West Ham: −0.41 / −4.5Burnley: −1.08 / −2.3Wolves: −0.79 / −15.5Man City: +0.83 / +4.0Man CityArsenalMan United

City took 78 points from chances worth 74.0, second on both counts. Second place was a fair reflection of the football. They made 2.01 non-penalty xG a game, the most in England, but Arsenal allowed far less.

Like Arsenal, City finished below their chances (about 7 goals fewer than expected, non-penalty), and the goalkeeper and defence saved them about 13 goals. The extra 4 points came from the back.

02The season in four acts

Form: chances made and allowed

■ npxG · ■ npxGA · Six-match average of non-penalty xG. Gap between the lines = how much better they were.

0.00.51.01.52.02.53.0Act 1Act 2Act 3Act 4
Act 1Act 2Act 3Act 4
Points / game1.902.302.002.00
Expected2.001.941.921.92
Chance diff.+1.02+0.78+0.51+0.99

Act 1 (Aug–Oct): 1.9 points a game with a big chance gap (+1.02). A slow start in results, not in football.

Act 2 (Nov–early Jan): the best run for results (2.3 a game), even though the chance gap had narrowed (+0.78).

Act 3 (Jan–early Mar) was the weak spell for chances (+0.51 a game). Act 4 brought the gap back to +0.99 and the League Cup (2-0 against Arsenal on 22 March), but league results stayed at 2.0 a game. The gap to Arsenal was never closed.

03How they played

Attack (chances made)100
Defence (chances kept down)95
Pressing63
Playing through pressure74
Reaching the box100
Keeping them out of the box95
Shot quality85
Set-piece share of chances10

Each bar: where they ranked among all teams in their league (100 = best). Pressing and playing-through-pressure use PPDA.

City's attack ranked top in the league for chances made and for reaching the box (10.8 entries a game near the opponent's area). The defence was second-tier elite (95th).

City pressed less than Arsenal (PPDA 10.7, around the league middle) and relied on control of the ball instead. They completed more passes close to the opponent's goal than anyone.

04Under pressure

When aheadabout league average−1 pp vs avg
Right after scoringsat back−6 pp vs avg
Right after concedingsat back−10 pp vs avg

Share of the match’s chances they created in that spell, compared with the rest of the same matches, then compared with the league average.

Points won from losing positions5
Points dropped from winning positions20
Goals after 75' (for–against)13–7
Home / away points per game2.37 / 1.74
Against the top six5-2-3 · 1.70

Here is the story of the season. City dropped 20 points from winning positions, the most of the seven clubs we follow, and won back only 5 from losing positions.

In the 15 minutes after conceding, City's share of the chances fell by about 10 points more than the average team's. After scoring, it fell too (−6). Goals in either direction seemed to knock them out of rhythm.

05Where the chances came from

19%59%13%9%
6-yard boxCentral boxWide boxOutside the box
  1. Passes33%
  2. Set pieces13%
  3. Through balls12%
  4. Crosses11%

Finishing: -7.1 goals vs xG (non-penalty) · Goalkeeping/defending: +13.1 goals saved vs xG

City's chances were the most central in England: 59% of their non-penalty xG came from the middle of the box. Through balls and dribbles created a bigger share of chances than at any other club in the league.

The flip side: crosses (5th percentile) and set pieces (10th percentile for share) mattered little, and only 16% of their xG came from headers. City played through teams, not over them.

06The players

PlayerGoalsxGAssistsxA
Erling Haaland2728.885.5
Mathis Cherki44.61210.8
Phil Foden76.756.1
Jérémy Doku54.057.5
Nico O'Reilly56.733.9
Antoine Semenyo · joined during the season74.9––
Tijjani Reijnders54.923.1
Omar Marmoush33.832.1

Chief creators (xA): Mathis Cherki 10.8 · Jérémy Doku 7.5 · Phil Foden 6.1
Build-up engines (xGBuildup): Matheus Nunes 20.3 · Bernardo Silva 19.4 · Nico O'Reilly 14.8

Erling Haaland scored 27 league goals from 28.8 xG. He was reliable, though not above his chances.

Mathis Cherki was the creative find: 12 assists and 10.8 xA in under 1,800 minutes. Jérémy Doku (7.5 xA) and Phil Foden (7 goals, 6.1 xA) completed the creative trio.

Matheus Nunes and Bernardo Silva led the squad in build-up involvement. Antoine Semenyo, who joined during the season, scored 7 from 4.9 xG for City and won the FA Cup final.

07What it means for 2026/27

Season review

Guardiola's last lesson: control is not only about the ball

City's football in Guardiola's final season still produced the best attack in England. What it lost was control of the scoreboard. A team that makes this many chances should not drop 20 points from winning positions.

Enzo Maresca inherits a side whose problem is not chance creation. The work is in the minutes after a goal: who holds the ball, who protects the counter, and how quickly the shape resets.

The cup double shows the ceiling is still high. The league numbers show where the next coach can find points without changing the attack at all.

Lessons
  • On the pitch: after you score, the next 10 minutes are the most dangerous. Keep the same structure instead of going looser or deeper.
  • In FM26: if you dominate xG but keep dropping leads, look at your mentality shifts after goals before you change the formation.
  • When watching: see where a team's shots come from. City's came from the centre of the box, not from crosses.
Risk to this viewPoints dropped from winning positions can be heavily shaped by a few late goals. The 13-goal goalkeeping surplus is unlikely to repeat in full. The reasons for City's wobbles after goals are our interpretation, not something the data proves.

League matches only. Expected points come from the shots each side created; luck and finishing quality both live in the gap.

08Sources

  1. Understat (league match and shot data)
  2. Wikipedia: 2025–26 Premier League
  3. Wikipedia: 2026 FA Cup final
  4. Wikipedia: 2026 EFL Cup final
  5. Wikipedia: 2025–26 UEFA Champions League