Tactics Explained
Season review
Premier League · 2025/26

Liverpool 2025/26

The champions' defence ended in fifth place. Liverpool's chances were good enough for fourth, so the drop was not mainly bad luck. They rarely scored early, conceded late, and the final two months fell apart.

Trophies: None · Champions League: quarter-final (PSG) · Community Shield: lost on penalties (Crystal Palace)

5th · 60 ptsLeague finish · 17-9-12
61.5Expected points · ranked 4th
+0.39Chance difference per game · ranked 4th
−1.5Points vs chances

01Did they deserve it?

Points vs expected points, match by match

Solid line: real points. Dashed: points the chances were worth.

02040600102030 6061.5

Every team: chances vs luck

Right = better chance difference per game. Up = more points than the chances were worth.

bigger chance gap →↑ more points than chancesArsenal: +1.09 / +5.2Man City: +0.83 / +4.0Man United: +0.54 / +6.6Aston Villa: +0.03 / +13.9Bournemouth: +0.27 / −3.4Sunderland: −0.49 / +12.0Brighton: +0.14 / −2.4Brentford: +0.15 / −4.2Chelsea: +0.25 / −6.9Fulham: −0.32 / +6.9Newcastle: +0.07 / −5.8Everton: −0.23 / +2.8Leeds: +0.05 / −9.5Crystal Palace: +0.04 / −8.9Nottm Forest: −0.36 / +1.7Spurs: −0.17 / −8.2West Ham: −0.41 / −4.5Burnley: −1.08 / −2.3Wolves: −0.79 / −15.5Liverpool: +0.39 / −1.5LiverpoolArsenalMan CityMan United

Liverpool took 60 points from chances worth 61.5, fourth-best in the league by chances. This is the only one of our seven clubs that finished below its chances, but only by 1.5 points. The season was roughly what the football deserved.

Finishing was below par (about 6 goals fewer than expected, non-penalty), and unlike the clubs above them, the goalkeeping gave little back (+1.8). There was no cushion.

02The season in four acts

Form: chances made and allowed

■ npxG · ■ npxGA · Six-match average of non-penalty xG. Gap between the lines = how much better they were.

0.00.51.01.52.02.5Act 1Act 2Act 3Act 4
Act 1Act 2Act 3Act 4
Points / game1.801.601.561.33
Expected1.561.861.891.14
Chance diff.+0.28+0.77+0.89−0.39

Act 1 (Aug–Oct): 1.8 points a game from chances worth 1.56. The early results flattered a team that was not yet creating much (+0.28 chance gap).

Acts 2–3 (Nov–early Mar): the football improved (+0.77, then +0.89) but results went the other way (1.6, then 1.56). This was the unlucky spell.

Act 4 (mid-Mar–May) is the collapse: 1.33 points a game and, for the first time, a negative chance gap (−0.39). Opponents created more than Liverpool. That is not luck. The team ran out of answers as the European exit to PSG came and went.

03How they played

Attack (chances made)79
Defence (chances kept down)79
Pressing68
Playing through pressure79
Reaching the box95
Keeping them out of the box89
Shot quality40
Set-piece share of chances5

Each bar: where they ranked among all teams in their league (100 = best). Pressing and playing-through-pressure use PPDA.

Liverpool got the ball into dangerous areas very often (9.8 times a game near the opponent's goal, 95th percentile), and were hard to press (79th).

But the chances were not great ones: shots came from further out than at most clubs (median 16.9 m) and shot quality sat below average (0.114 xG a shot).

04Under pressure

When aheadabout league average−4 pp vs avg
Right after scoringabout league average−3 pp vs avg
Right after concedingpushed for more+4 pp vs avg

Share of the match’s chances they created in that spell, compared with the rest of the same matches, then compared with the league average.

Points won from losing positions5
Points dropped from winning positions15
Goals after 75' (for–against)20–17
Home / away points per game1.89 / 1.26
Against the top six3-1-6 · 1.00

Liverpool conceded 17 goals after the 75th minute, the most of our seven clubs. They dropped 15 points from winning positions and won back only 5 from losing ones.

When ahead, they backed off more than the average team (−4 points of chance share vs the league). Starts were slow too: only 8% of their open-play xG came in the first 15 minutes, among the lowest in the league.

05Where the chances came from

24%51%13%12%
6-yard boxCentral boxWide boxOutside the box
  1. Passes37%
  2. Crosses14%
  3. Set pieces13%
  4. Rebounds8%

Finishing: -6.3 goals vs xG (non-penalty) · Goalkeeping/defending: +1.8 goals saved vs xG

The best part of their attack was winning the ball back: chances created straight from a regain made up a bigger share for Liverpool than for any other team in England. Passing moves were also the league's biggest share.

The missing piece was set pieces. They made up just 17.5% of Liverpool's chances, the 5th percentile. For a team struggling to break blocks, that is a big source of goals left on the table.

06The players

PlayerGoalsxGAssistsxA
Hugo Ekitike1111.942.5
Mohamed Salah78.876.4
Dominik Szoboszlai64.778.8
Cody Gakpo79.856.6
Florian Wirtz57.635.4
Ryan Gravenberch51.532.4
Virgil van Dijk64.900.3
Alexis Mac Allister24.142.9

Chief creators (xA): Dominik Szoboszlai 8.8 · Cody Gakpo 6.6 · Mohamed Salah 6.4
Build-up engines (xGBuildup): Dominik Szoboszlai 15.1 · Virgil van Dijk 11.4 · Ibrahima Konaté 10.8

In his first season, Hugo Ekitike scored 11 from 11.9 xG, the most reliable finisher. Florian Wirtz, also new, scored 5 from 7.6 xG with 5.4 xA: good numbers, but not yet the step-change the fee promised.

Mohamed Salah had 7 goals and 7 assists, well below his usual level. Dominik Szoboszlai was the engine: 8.8 xA, the most build-up involvement in the squad and minutes across several positions.

Ryan Gravenberch scored 5 from just 1.5 xG, and Virgil van Dijk 6 from 4.9.

07What it means for 2026/27

Season review

What Iraola is walking into

Liverpool's problem was not one thing. It was three small leaks: slow starts, a weak set-piece threat and goals conceded late. Together they turned a fourth-place team into a fifth-place one, and the last two months into a slide.

Andoni Iraola arrives with a reputation for intense, front-foot pressing. The base suits him: this squad already wins the ball back and shoots from regains more than anyone. The quick gains are in the boring parts: set-piece routines and the last 15 minutes.

The bigger question is the attack's quality. Plenty of entries but long-range shots means the final pass or run is missing. That is where Wirtz's second season matters.

Lessons
  • On the pitch: a counter-press is only half the job. Winning the ball high is wasted if the shot comes from 20 metres.
  • In FM26: if your team concedes late a lot, check stamina and substitutions before the tactic. The last 15 minutes are where depth shows.
  • When watching: check where a team's shots come from, not just how many it takes. Liverpool shot often but from further out.
Risk to this viewLate goals conceded depend on a handful of moments. The Act 4 collapse covers nine games. Set-piece share is low partly because open-play volume was high.

League matches only. Expected points come from the shots each side created; luck and finishing quality both live in the gap.

08Sources

  1. Understat (league match and shot data)
  2. Wikipedia: 2025–26 Premier League
  3. Wikipedia: 2025–26 UEFA Champions League
  4. Wikipedia: 2025 FA Community Shield